Velvet's agency earnings analytics reports revenue per creator and per closer straight from the wallet ledger. Subscriptions, tips, PPV and gifts roll up into roster-level dashboards you can trust for splits, commissions and payout decisions.
Gross sales, platform fees, creator net and agency commission all come from allocations recorded at settlement, minus the reversals recorded against them. No rate is applied a second time when the page loads, which is the only way a report and a balance stay equal.
A sale can be settled, partially reversed or fully reversed, and the arithmetic subtracts the reversed portion from each column separately. A half-refunded sale reduces gross, platform fee and creator net by its own amounts rather than disappearing or staying whole.
The query is scoped to the profiles your tenant may reach before it aggregates anything. A roster total is the sum of what you are entitled to see, not a filtered view of something larger.
Every figure in analytics is derived from settled wallet transactions. There is no parallel bookkeeping to reconcile and no way for reported earnings to drift from real balances.
Refunds and chargebacks flow through the same ledger, so net revenue is genuinely net: the number you split is the number that exists.
Break revenue down by creator profile, product type and period to see which parts of the roster grow and which stall. Compare cohorts after pricing or content changes.
Closer reports attribute PPV and chat-driven revenue to the person who worked the conversation, giving you an audited basis for commissions and shift planning.
An obligation carries an amount, a currency, a due date and a status, and it moves through submission by the agency and confirmation by the creator with the payment reference attached. Both sides read the same object.
Because obligations reserve against your balance, the dashboard cannot flatter you. Money earmarked for a creator is subtracted from what the page calls available for as long as the obligation is open, and the ones past due are counted where you will see them.
A refund or chargeback is recorded against the allocation it reverses, with its own gross, platform fee and creator net figures. The report subtracts each of those from its own column instead of adjusting a single total and hoping the rest still balances.
That is what makes a commission conversation short. The number your terms apply to is money that stayed, and the arithmetic that produced it can be pointed at rather than described.
Because analytics and balances share the ledger, agreed splits are applied to numbers everyone can verify: creator, agency and closer see the same underlying transactions.
Month-end stops being a negotiation. Export the period, apply the terms, settle payouts through the ledger, done.
No. Outstanding remittance obligations are summed and subtracted from the wallet balance before anything is presented as available commission. What the page calls available is what is genuinely free to withdraw.
It reads the allocations and the wallet directly, so a settled sale appears as soon as it settles. There is no nightly rebuild that could be a day behind the balance it is meant to describe.
Yes, by construction. The totals are summed from the same per-creator rows the table shows, over the same authorised set, rather than being computed by a second query that could disagree with the first.
Reports read from the wallet ledger, so revenue appears as transactions settle rather than in an overnight batch. What you see reflects the actual state of each creator's wallet.
Yes. Role-based access lets each creator see their own earnings while agency roles see roster-level views. Closers see only the performance data appropriate to their role.
Yes. Reversals are ledger entries like any other, so per-creator and per-closer reports show net figures and commissions are computed on money that actually stayed.
Your agency wallet balance minus everything currently reserved against open remittance obligations. It is what you could withdraw today, not what you have earned in total.
A reversal is recorded against the allocation it undoes, with its own gross, platform and creator net amounts, and each column is reduced by its own figure. Partially reversed sales stay partially counted.
No. The aggregation is scoped to the creator profiles your tenant is authorised for before any total is computed, so there is no view in which an unauthorised creator contributes a number.
Nothing available and something still maturing. The status is derived from the available and pending figures at read time rather than stored as a field somebody has to keep in step.